Dspyt-CodeVerse
Dspyt-CodeVerse enhances the Web3 ecosystem by providing resources, mentorship, and collaboration opportunities for Blockchain, Python, JavaScript, and Next.js communities, prioritizing innovation and inclusion.User Review
R1
Reviewed on 1 Apr 2024 10:27 PM
This round focuses on *individuals only*. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission. We invite collaborators on one effort to submit grant proposals individually, detailing what and how they personally contributed. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
Essential intents: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/update-gitcoin-s-ratified-essential-intents-2023-2024-and-a-recap-of-our-successes/16818
Ecosystem Collective: https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/introducing-gitcoin-s-ecosystem-collective/17954
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin. Some (non-exhaustive) examples:
- educational content, eg. a guide on how to donate on our platform
- promotional content, eg running a twitter space to cover our rounds
- data analysis, eg. a data analysis of previous donations
- operations, eg. running a grants round
- governance, eg. adding meaningful contributions to the forum discussions
- community support, eg. helping out users in our discord
- platform and protocol dev, eg. pull requests or standalone add-ons
This round will focus on retroactive work only, i.e. work delivered in the past. For planned work, go to http://gitcoin.co/citizens. Only one proposal is allowed per grantee.
All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing all captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views.) The submission should include proof of impact, including links to where the work was delivered and received (e.g, content creation needs supporting usage analytics, governance participation should have relevant links to gov posts, individual involvement in a collective effort should have specific dates, links to Twitter space, or recordings.)
The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received. Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. Examples of these include bug reports with minimal impact, non-strategic comments on the governance forum, translations of gitcoin content and other communication efforts which can easily be automated (AI, Google translate).
Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
I am not seeing the difference between the first & second application, but maybe I'm missing something.
Also, this still seems to be an organization, not an individual.
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 30 Mar 2024 01:01 AM
Full eligibility criteria can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_3NBrRXnGAzMo9LNl-cSPZy8nqnYtjUdQJbiGR5IbM/edit?usp=sharing
Without access to external documents, I cannot evaluate the project against the full eligibility criteria.
Eligibility requirement: This round focuses on *individuals only*. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission. We invite collaborators on one effort to submit grant proposals individually, detailing what and how they personally contributed. Please indicate in the title of the grant the name of the individual Gitcoin Citizen this grant submission is rewarding.
The submission seems to focus on an organization 'Dspyt-CodeVerse' rather than an individual, and the title of the grant doesn't indicate a specific individual Gitcoin Citizen.
Eligibility requirement: Work should contribute directly to Gitcoin’s Essential Intents and/or the Ecosystem Collective’s focus areas.
The project description suggests it directly contributes to the ecosystem by fostering innovation, education, and community building in Web3, aligning with Gitcoin's Essential Intents and Ecosystem Collective's focus areas.
Eligibility requirement: The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how you supported Gitcoin.
The proposal provides an extensive description of the activities but lacks explicit details on how these supported Gitcoin specifically, and whether they fall within Gitcoin's definition of support.
Eligibility requirement: This round will focus on retroactive work only, i.e. work delivered in the past. For planned work, go to http://gitcoin.co/citizens. Only one proposal is allowed per grantee.
The project description indicates past contributions to the Web3 technology space, and there is no mention of planned future work, satisfying the retroactive work requirement.
Eligibility requirement: All submissions should outline the impact of their work, by referencing all captured data (e.g. viewers, forks, branches, listeners of a twitter space, posts written and number of likes and views.) The submission should include proof of impact, including links to where the work was delivered and received (e.g, content creation needs supporting usage analytics, governance participation should have relevant links to gov posts, individual involvement in a collective effort should have specific dates, links to Twitter space, or recordings.)
The submission does not provide quantitative data or reference links to captured impacts such as viewership numbers, forks, branches, or other metrics that could demonstrate the impact of the work.
Eligibility requirement: The proof of impact should show that the effort was well-received. Low or minimal impact efforts will not qualify. Examples of these include bug reports with minimal impact, non-strategic comments on the governance forum, translations of gitcoin content and other communication efforts which can easily be automated (AI, Google translate).
The provided submission lacks proof of impact that demonstrates the work was well-received by the community, such as high viewership numbers, engagement metrics, or positive testimonials.
Eligibility requirement: Grantees cannot be paid twice by Gitcoin for the same work, so any and all work that is submitted should be outside of the scope of Citizens Innovate, Forward or any other contracted work.
There is no information available about previous payments for the work submitted, making it impossible to ascertain whether the grantee has already been compensated by Gitcoin for the same work.