Let's GROW DAO
A DAO focused on uniting and growing the Regen/ReFi movement, creating a vibrant community, and promoting collaborative progress through initiatives like decentralised media platforms and inclusive events.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 3 Aug 2024 08:01 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project is 9 months old as indicated in their application and public registration dates for the project website and social media accounts corroborate this.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems’ CO2 Sequestration.
The grant proposal highlights the project's dedication to climate solutions through ReFi, climate activism, and collective coordination efforts specifically aimed at reducing GHGs.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) are required to provide a new update on their progress and impact via KarmaGAP. Each project must have a minimum of 2 milestones updated since the completion of GG20 AND include a summary of the project’s climate impact over the past year. Projects can also include the challenges they have faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and provide context for your work and accomplishments
The project has provided a Karma GAP link and listed milestones related to their progress and impact within the past year, fulfilling the requirement.
Even if the project was accepted into previous rounds, grantees will be eliminated from participation in the GG21QF Round for the following reasons:
-If they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community
-If they submit more than one project into the round
-If they are primarily a token launch or NFT project to raise money for a liquidity pool
-If the project does not clearly demonstrate a primary focus on being a climate solution with clear and proven climate impacts
There is no evidence of malicious manipulation, multiple project submissions, or being primarily a token launch/NFT project. The project focuses on climate solutions with clear impacts.
All returning grantees are required to include the following:
-An update to their proposal including any lessons learned from previous work
-A description of how they plan to use the additional funding from the upcoming round and how additional funding will help the project meet its goals
-A rough timeline for the project overall
-A short bio for each team member and their qualifications
The project has provided an update to their proposal outlining lessons learned, usage of additional funding, a rough project timeline, and team member bios with qualifications.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team’s expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project outlines a credible approach to climate solutions leveraging web3 technology, alongside detailed team qualifications and expertise.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility.
The project has confirmed in their application that they comply with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility criteria.