oxygenchain
Oxygen-chain incentivizes eco-compliance in waste management through a transparent reward system using IoT sensors and real-time data for accountability.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 04:15 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
Insufficient information is provided about the inception date of 'oxygenchain' to determine if it meets the age requirement.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Oxygenchain aims to incentivize compliance with environmental regulations through a transparent reward system, potentially reducing GHGs via better waste treatment management, which aligns with the grant's focus on climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is no data available indicating whether 'oxygenchain' has received previous funding or provided progress reports. Hence, this assessment is uncertain.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
There is not enough context to determine whether 'oxygenchain' is a returning grantee or if they have updated their proposal with the required information.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
Oxygenchain presents a plausible solution using IoT sensors and rewards systems that are feasible technologies, indicating the project is within the 'realm of viability'.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided on any potential malicious activities associated with 'oxygenchain'. The assessment is therefore uncertain without further investigation.