Sungura Mjanja Refi
Eco-friendly NFT initiative plants 100 trees per NFT sold, aiming to plant one million trees in Tanzania, empowering farmers, and leveraging web3 for transparent carbon sequestration and climate change combat.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 04:36 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
Without information on the project's start date, it's unclear if it meets the 3-month criterion.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project is centered on reducing GHGs through tree planting, which is directly tied to climate solutions, and leverages web3 technology for carbon credit trading.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
Without information on previous funding and progress reports, it cannot be determined if this requirement has been met.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
It is not clear from the provided information if this grantee is returning or if the project proposal has been updated with the necessary details.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project's use of agroforestry and the tokenization of carbon credits is within the realm of current technological and ecological viability.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
With no information provided about the grantee's conduct surrounding Gitcoin community guidelines, this cannot be assessed.