regrò
Promoting ecological restoration and conservation across 40 hectares in four countries, regrò integrates permaculture, local knowledge, and technology to reintroduce native species and protect ecosystems since 2019.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 04:04 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project 'regrò' has been operational since 2019, which is well over the minimum requirement of 3 months.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
regrò's work with reforestation, conservation, and regeneration of ecosystems is directly aimed at climate solutions and has the potential to reduce GHGs.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is no information provided regarding previous funding rounds or progress reports since such funding, so it cannot be determined if this requirement has been met.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The description provided does not include details on whether 'regrò' has received past funding, nor does it mention an updated proposal or lessons learned. Additional context is required to properly evaluate this.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The regrò project appears to be viable as it is already stewarding land and actively engaging in climate-positive activities like reforestation and ecosystem conservation.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no indication that the 'regrò' project has engaged in any form of malicious manipulation or encouraged Sybil attacks. The information provided does not suggest any such activity.