La Madriguera
We were born as a small reforestation area, becoming a playground open to the public so that people can have contact with nature outdoors. https://ibb.co/KKJR8bSUser Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 30 Jul 2024 11:00 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project is 87 months old, as confirmed by their application and public information on their Twitter account.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & dMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems’ CO2 Sequestration.
The project is primarily focused on reforestation and environmental education, which are key aspects of Natural Systems’ CO2 Sequestration.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) are required to provide a new update on their progress and impact via KarmaGAP. Each project must have a minimum of 2 milestones updated since the completion of GG20 AND include a summary of the project’s climate impact over the past year. Projects can also include the challenges they have faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and provide context for your work and accomplishments.
The project has provided their KarmaGAP link with updated milestones and a summary of their climate impact over the past year.
Even if the project was accepted into previous rounds, grantees will be eliminated from participation in the GG21QF Round for the following reasons:
-If they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community
-If they submit more than one project into the round
-If they are primarily a token launch or NFT project to raise money for a liquidity pool
-If the project does not clearly demonstrate a primary focus on being a climate solution with clear and proven climate impacts
There is no indication that the project is involved in Sybil attacks, token launches, or NFTs. The project clearly demonstrates a primary focus on being a climate solution.
All returning grantees are required to include the following:
-An update to their proposal including any lessons learned from previous work
-A description of how they plan to use the additional funding from the upcoming round and how additional funding will help the project meet its goals
-A rough timeline for the project overall
-A short bio for each team member and their qualifications
The project has provided an update to their proposal, a description of how they plan to use additional funding, a rough timeline, and short bios for team members with their qualifications.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team’s expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project is within the realm of viability, has a team with credible expertise, and demonstrates a genuine intent to build and maintain the project as evidenced by their long-term activities.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility.
There is no indication that the project violates any of Gitcoin’s core rules and eligibility requirements.