VoiceDeck: A Marketplace for Journalism Impact Certificates
Funding journalists via web3 certificates for stories with measurable impact, bypassing traditional grant models, focusing on accountability and incentive for sustained reporting.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 6 Aug 2024 04:01 PM
At least one project lead must be a member of the OpenCivics Consortium
The provided information does not specify whether any of the project leads are members of the OpenCivics Consortium.
Projects must conduct research that is Creative Commons as a public good
The project description and application do not explicitly state that the research will be Creative Commons as a public good.
Research must fall into one of the focus areas listed in the round description
The focus areas listed in the round description are not provided in the evaluation request. Therefore, it is ambiguous if the project aligns with any specified focus areas.
Projects must agree to coordinate and collaborate during and after the round with other grantees to collate and present their research progress in a Grantee Impact Showcase prior to GG22
There is no explicit statement in the provided project information confirming that they agree to these terms.
Grant applications must direct funds to a multi-signature wallet
The project application does not indicate whether funds will be directed to a multi-signature wallet.
Projects must indicate what collaborative mechanism they will utilize to govern, evaluate and compensate participant contributions (Coordinape, DeWork, Charmverse, Notion, DAO Haus, Google Docs & Sheets, etc)
The project mentions using Google Docs & Sheets as a collaborative governance mechanism.
Projects must indicate reasonable and verifiable milestones for the following possible funding amounts received: $1,000; $3,000; $6,000
The project outlines specific milestones for the funding amounts received, including formulating the research question, getting quotations from lawyers, and obtaining a formal legal opinion.