Romko.eth
Experienced crypto translator with a focus on blockchain and cryptocurrencies, providing analytic articles to develop the Ukrainian Arbitrum community and inform readers.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:32 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The grant proposal emphasizes support for the Arbitrum community and the creation of content for BanklessUA, which indirectly supports Gitcoin's mission by aiding in the spread of blockchain knowledge. However, it does not explicitly state how the work has supported or will support the Gitcoin Community directly.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
The submission appears to be from a single individual, Romko.eth, as confirmed by the personal pronouns used and the individual's profiles linked (Twitter and GitHub).
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
The applicant lists articles and content previously created but does not explicitly state if the funding is intended for retrospective compensation or future work. There is no clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
As an AI, I cannot access external documents or websites and, therefore, cannot verify against the full eligibility criteria document. The evaluator must manually check the full eligibility requirements to determine the compliance of the proposal.