Loyalty Harvest
Develop a standardized template for rewarding NFT holders based on duration held, using Merkle proofs for low-cost claims and ECDSA for flexible claiming options. Now refining smart contracts, tests, and building frontend.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:29 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The project description provided does not explicitly outline how the work has supported or will support the Gitcoin Community; the connection to Gitcoin’s mission and community is not clearly explained in the description provided.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
The submission appears to be from an individual (RohanNero) rather than a team, which complies with the eligibility criteria.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
The project description mentions work that has already been done, such as writing the smart contract and tests, as well as work to be done, like fleshing out the project and finishing the frontend. However, the description does not clearly demarcate the retrospective and prospective components of the work in relation to funding.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
Without access to the full grant proposal and not having the capability to access external URLs, it is not possible to ascertain if all the detailed eligibility criteria in the provided document are met.