User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 25 Jul 2024 01:00 PM
The Grant must be in support of or directly advance the Asian public goods ecosystem; or at least one founder identifies him/herself as Asian. We will refer to the [public goods report](https://www.gccofficial.org/explore.html#report) released by GCC last December for the definition of public goods.
The project aims to educate the public on blockchain, cryptocurrency, and decentralization within Asian communities and several team members are identified as Asian, as indicated in their application.
The project must clearly articulate the problem it addresses, the solution, the implementation plan, the financial plan, and demonstrate there is an excellent team or community for execution.
The project articulates its goals of public education on blockchain and crypto governance, has a detailed implementation and financial plan, and showcases a strong team with relevant backgrounds.
Project must be 3 months old and the project must demonstrate some tangible progress towards their stated goals, with a working MVP is available to the public. We will use Twitter, official website, github, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
There is no provided project website, Github, or recent Twitter activity to verify the age of the project or progress towards their stated goals. Public verification of a working MVP is also not clear.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided that indicates the project is encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or any other forms of malicious manipulation; however, there is no clear verification either.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and [eligibility criteria](https://gov.gitcoin.co/t/gg21-community-round-eligibility-criteria/19003).
Without further details on aspects such as code of conduct and transparency, it's unclear if the project fully complies with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility criteria.