Coffee Impact Collective

Coffee Impact Collective

Creating a sustainable ecosystem for coffee farming through regenerative agriculture, decentralized markets, and innovation to ensure resilience and environmental responsibility in coffee production.
Application
Applied on: 8 Nov 2023 07:01 PM
Approved
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:49 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
Insufficient information provided regarding the exact date of the project's establishment, Twitter account creation date or web domain registration date to determine the project age.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The Coffee Impact Collective project is focused on regenerative agriculture and decentralization of coffee supply chains, which can contribute to GHG reduction and be seen as an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The project has provided updates on progress from the Gitcoin Alpha Round, including accomplishments like scientific research and drafting the methodology proposal.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The submission provides some information on future plans but does not clearly indicate lessons learned from previous work or a detailed proposal on how additional funding will be used, including a rough timeline for the project.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**.
Project seems within the realm of viability with a practical focus on regenerative agriculture and supply chain improvements. The detailed methodology and association with credible partners also lend credibility. However, detailed information on the team's expertise, qualifications, and skills was not provided.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided that suggests the project has been involved in Sybil attacks or malicious manipulation, but without further data or monitoring of their activities, it is not possible to definitively score this.