Rebuilding Turkiye
Aiding earthquake recovery in Turkiye through sustainable building with hempcrete, promoting hemp-based health remedies, and using DAOs for efficient, transparent regenerative development.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 03:02 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project 'Rebuilding Turkiye' mentions previous accomplishments since Gitcoin GR13 in April 2022, indicating that the project has been active for over a year from the time of assessment.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project focuses on sustainable building materials like hempcrete for earthquake-resistant housing and hemp-based products that are environmentally friendly, which aligns with climate solutions by promoting the use of renewable resources and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The project description provides a list of accomplishments since Gitcoin GR13, such as distributing seeds and establishing collaborations, which demonstrates progress and accountability.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
While the project outlines its current focuses and past accomplishments, there is no explicit mention of lessons learned from previous work or a detailed plan on how additional funding will be used, nor is there a rough timeline for the project's goals.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The 'Rebuilding Turkiye' project appears viable, with practical applications and an established track record, despite not having a Github presence. The focus on regenerative development rooted in current technologies and sustainable practices is credible and aligns with understood climate solutions.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There's no evidence or indication provided that 'Rebuilding Turkiye' has been involved in Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the Gitcoin platform or community, thus the score is 'Yes' by default in the absence of such evidence.