Climecheck
A community-driven climate data platform with real-time monitoring using sensors, offering insights to the public, businesses, and regulators while supporting machine learning and data stewardship.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 03:43 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
No information provided about the project's age, thus cannot determine if the project meets the age requirement.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project is designed to monitor climate data and contribute to solutions for climate change, which aligns with the criteria of being primarily focused on climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is a lack of information provided on whether Climecheck received funding in previous rounds and project progress, making it uncertain if this criterion is met.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
No information on previous grantee status or an updated proposal could be assessed, making it uncertain if this criterion is met.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
Climecheck presents a detailed approach combining hardware, software, and intelligence for climate monitoring, which seems credible and viably within the scope of web3 technology and climate solutions.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no indication that Climecheck has been involved in encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation.