Green Planet Conservation Initiative
Plant 1 million trees in Northern Nigeria by 2030, targeting 10,000 students through school campaigns to combat deforestation and climate change while promoting environmental conservation and sustainability.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:19 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information does not include specific dates of the project's commencement, Twitter account creation, or website domain registration.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. - Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
The project is focused on tree planting as a means to combat deforestation, soil degradation, and enhance CO2 sequestration, which directly relates to climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. - We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
There is no evidence that the project has received previous funding or has provided updates on progress, impact, or challenges faced; nor is there mention of Hypercert minting.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The information provided does not indicate if the grantee is a returning applicant. Therefore, it's uncertain if an updated proposal is applicable or available.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. - Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. - Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project proposes a credible solution to environmental issues, which falls within the realm of viability. Although there is limited information on the team's qualifications, the project description implies genuine intent to build and execute the project.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no indication or evidence from the available information that the project is involved in manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.