ONCE - the metamodern media venture studio
A transformative platform integrating strategy, leverage, momentum, AI, web3, and the creator economy to catalyze collective intelligence, cultural development, and regenerative projects through media, collaboration, and innovative economic models.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:34 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project's age cannot be determined with the information provided. There is no mention of the creation date on the project's Twitter or website. Further verification is required using Twitter, web domain registration date, or other public information.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems CO2 Sequestration
The project description does not clearly outline how it will help reduce greenhouse gases or serve as core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. It seems to be focused on media, community building, and regenerative cultural change without a direct link to tangible climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) must provide a new update on their progress and impact. You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing. We encourage grantees to mint Hypercerts for the work and the impact they have accomplished. Priority review will be given to grantees who have minted a Hypercert.
There is no information provided about previous funding rounds or updates on progress and impact. Without this data, it cannot be determined whether the project meets this criterion.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
It is not clear whether this is a returning grantee. Furthermore, there is no provided update on the project proposal detailing lessons learned, usage of additional funding, or a project timeline, hence cannot assess against this criterion.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project appears ambitious and innovative but with the information provided, it's unclear if it is within the 'realm of viability.' There's no specific mention of the team's expertise, qualifications, specific web3 technologies, or direct application to climate solutions to establish credibility or practicality.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information available to determine if the project has engaged in malicious activities such as Sybil attacks. Further investigation would be necessary to decide on this criterion.