LunCo - collaborative systems engineering
A decentralized virtual world integrating space and robotics models for collaborative engineering, offering educational and social features with IP-NFTs for design sharing.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 01:09 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The provided information includes links to a Twitter account and a Github repository which suggest the project has an online presence older than 3 months.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project description suggests it is focused on systems engineering and data sovereignty in the space and robotics industries, with an educational component. While it mentions potential space-based solar power and agricultural monitoring, there is insufficient detail to determine a primary focus on climate solutions.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There's no explicit mention of previous funding rounds or updates on progress and impact relating to those funds, so it's unclear whether this criterion is applicable.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The eligibility of the project as a returning grantee is not clear from the provided information, therefore it is uncertain whether they have provided the necessary updated proposal and reflection on lessons learned.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant.
While the project seems to have a technological footing, its relevance and credibility specifically in the realm of climate solutions is not clearly demonstrated, nor is the team's expertise in this area detailed.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information indicating that the project has been involved in enabling or encouraging Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation.