Carbon Anti-Theft
Implement a smart contract, "Carbon Flow," using ERC-1155 to regulate carbon token transfers, prevent theft, and enable carbon token swaps. It introduces voluntary emissions withdrawal, "retired" tokens, and competitive carbon tax set by DAOs. Funds will finalize the DAO's user interface and audit the smart contract.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 13 Feb 2024 02:45 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
No specific project start date is provided, but the description suggests ongoing development and progress since the Alpha round. The user's GitHub activities further imply the project's existence beyond a 3-month period.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project proposal indicates that 'Carbon Anti-Theft' intends to secure carbon markets using blockchain technology, which is a core component of web3 climate solutions. By providing theft protection using ERC-1155, it can contribute to the integrity and effectiveness of carbon trading systems, indirectly supporting the reduction of GHGs.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha round. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
The project description includes a report on progress since the Alpha round, detailing the development of a DAO app, specific functionalities implemented, and other technical aspects. This demonstrates accountability and provides potential contributors with an understanding of project advancements.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
While the proposal updates the project development and states how the funds will be used, it lacks a clear outline of lessons learned from previous work or how specifically the additional funding will propel the project towards its goals. A rough timeline for the project is also missing.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project appears to be within the realm of viability for individuals familiar with web3 technology and climate solutions. The use of ERC-1155 for carbon market security is technically feasible, and the founder's genuine intention to build the project is indicated by the detailed progress report and existing GitHub activity.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
Based on the provided information, there is no evidence of the project encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other malicious manipulations. Hence, a definitive score cannot be assigned without additional investigation or monitoring.