Eugene Leventhal Instigating the Grants Report Work
Securing funding for the Web3 Grants report, involving pre- and post-GCP process discussions, collaborating on a grants metadata standard, and establishing a grants database and application system.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:16 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The project description indicates that the work led to a funded report valuable to the Gitcoin Community and included collaborations with Gitcoin team members that may result in community tools like a metadata standard and shared grants database.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
The grant application is submitted by an individual, Eugene Leventhal, rather than a team, which complies with the round's focus on individuals.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
The project description clarifies that the funding is for retroactive work that went into the engagement preceding and leading up to the State of Web3 Grants report.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
Since the content of the linked document cannot be evaluated within the context of this interaction due to technical constraints, a definitive score cannot be given on full eligibility criteria.