Microdemocracies
MicrodemocraciesUser Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 16 Apr 2024 06:03 AM
Project is creating impact through public goods, civic service, civic works, civic innovations or civic utilities.
With no project details provided for 'Microdemocracies', it is impossible to assess the impact in specified areas.
Project exhibits clear relevance to the broad framing of civic innovation.
Without a project description or link to additional resources, relevance to civic innovation cannot be determined.
At least one project steward is a member of OpenCivics consortium.
Membership status of 'Microdemocracies' stewards in the OpenCivics consortium is not provided.
Project team size and skills correlates to use of funds and desired impact.
Lack of information on the project's team size, skills, funding plan, and intended impact makes this assessment indeterminable.
Project demonstrates a clear track record of previous work.
The project's history, previous works, or delivered products are not specified.
Project must agree to participate in co-development of collaborative and grantee accountability protocols as part of their impact reporting process.
No information is provided on 'Microdemocracies' willingness or agreement to participate in such a co-development process.
Project adheres to OpenCivics Ethical Standards and Pledge.
The project's commitment to OpenCivics Ethical Standards and Pledge cannot be confirmed without further information.
Project stewards pass OFAC screening process.
No details are provided on the identity of the project stewards, nor information about their clearance of OFAC screening.
Optional: Project is encouraged to include focus on collaboration between projects or on tools and infrastructures for collaboration.
Due to the absence of project details, it's unclear if there is a focus on collaboration with other projects or development of collaboration tools.