Jerri.wtf
Gamified NFT and mobile game rewarding environmental action through proof-of-deed mosaics, direct proceeds sharing, real-world action integration, and a regenerative finance ecosystem combating real-world polluters.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 12:58 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
Lack of specific information about the project's start date makes it impossible to determine whether it is at least 3 months old.
The Grant must be **primarily focused on climate solutions** (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project clearly states its focus on encouraging environmental action through gamification and NFT rewards, which aligns with climate solution activities.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) **must provide a new update on their progress and impact.** You can also include the challenges you've faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is no information available on whether they have received prior funding and if so, whether they have provided an update on progress.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
Due to the lack of information about previous grant receipt and proposal updates, it cannot be determined if they meet this criterion.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the **“realm of viability”**. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team's expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant.
There is not enough information about the project team's qualifications or expertise to assess whether the project is in the 'realm of viability'.
Grantees can be eliminated from consideration in the round if they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community.
There is no information provided that indicates the project is involved in Sybil attacks or malicious manipulation, but without further investigation, no definitive assessment can be made.