DeFi Teddy
Teddy, a KOL in the Chinese Web3 community, developed Gitcoin analytical dashboards and promoted Gitcoin events, engaging over 25K participants. He plans to create a cost-efficient asset transfer bridge and a new informative donation dashboard.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:57 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The proposal includes a detailed description of how the project has supported the Gitcoin Community with tools and promotion activities, as well as future plans to develop additional tools for the community.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
The project submission appears to be from an individual known as Teddy, who is representing their contributions and forthcoming plans. There is no indication of a team submission.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
The proposal separates completed work (including GR18 dashboard and contributions to promoting Gitcoin in the Chinese community) from the planned work (such as developing a public good bridge and citizen round dashboard), providing a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
Without access to the mentioned document and the details within, an accurate score cannot be provided. Evaluation against the full eligibility criteria in the provided document cannot be carried out by the AI.