User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:58 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The provided project description states an aim related to sybil analysis during a Gitcoin round, which indicates potential support for the Gitcoin Community. However, the explicitness of the support outlined is not clear from the given information.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
Based on the project description and user GitHub information, it appears that 'gray_csv' is submitted by an individual, G-r-ay, aligning with the individual-focused requirement.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
The project description mentions work done during the first citizens round and gg18, suggesting a retroactive component, but it does not clarify whether there is also proposed work or a clear demarcation between the two.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
Without access to the detailed document and full grant proposal, it is not possible to assess whether all other eligibility criteria have been met.