Ethereum Dispute Resolution Ecosystem Mapping Initiative

Ethereum Dispute Resolution Ecosystem Mapping Initiative

Researching and mapping Ethereum dispute resolution platforms to understand their mechanisms and effectiveness, aiming to enhance fairness and efficiency in the decentralized ecosystem. Led by specialists in governance and DAOs.
Application
Applied on: 21 Nov 2023 11:22 AM
Approved
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 06:51 AM
You are a researcher. To qualify for this round you need to have a track record of research. This can be as part of an academic affiliation or as an independent researcher. If you are applying for a grant for your first research project, email hello@metagov.org with more info on why you are the right person to conduct this research.
The project lead, Jamilya Kamalova, is a PhD candidate with publications in relevant areas, indicating a track record of research.
Governance focus for the research. We will only accept grants that have a clear focus on governance. As noted in the description, you don’t necessarily need to focus exclusively on DAO or web3 governance, but your research needs to be applicable to decentralized governance broadly. A focus on Arbitrum or Uniswap is appreciated but not required.
The project focuses on dispute resolution within the Ethereum ecosystem, which is a critical aspect of decentralized governance.
No for-profit funding. If you have received VC funding or any other kind of funding that requires a return on investment, then it will not qualify. It is ok if you’ve received other grants.
The information provided does not specify the type of funding received by the project team, making it impossible to determine if they are in compliance with this criterion without further inquiry.
No retrospective funding. The research must either be launched soon or currently ongoing. Completed projects are not eligible for funding in this round.
Based on the project description, it appears that the research is ongoing, aiming to produce a comprehensive map, and therefore meets the criterion not being retrospectively funded.