Distributed Governance Score Framework: DAO Index

Distributed Governance Score Framework: DAO Index

Developing the DAO Index, a standardized framework tool to enhance transparency and governance by benchmarking organization alignment with decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).
Application
Applied on: 14 Apr 2024 11:51 PM
Rejected
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Apr 2024 12:01 AM
Project is creating impact through public goods, civic service, civic works, civic innovations or civic utilities.
The DAO Index tool aids in assessing and improving decentralized governance transparency, which qualifies as a public good and civic innovation by enhancing transparency and governance quality.
Project exhibits clear relevance to the broad framing of civic innovation.
The DAO Index directly relates to civic innovation by proposing new standards for decentralized governance alignment and transparency, reinforcing the quality and accountability of civic structures.
At least one project steward is a member of OpenCivics consortium.
The provided information does not specify whether a project steward is a member of the OpenCivics consortium, this information must be verified.
Project team size and skills correlates to use of funds and desired impact.
There is insufficient information regarding the specific team size or skills; the correlation between these factors and the use of funds and intended impact cannot be effectively evaluated without additional details.
Project demonstrates a clear track record of previous work.
The project has outlined numerous outputs and tools related to DAO governance analysis, demonstrating tangible previous efforts and contributions.
Project must agree to participate in co-development of collaborative and grantee accountability protocols as part of their impact reporting process.
There is no clear statement regarding the project's commitment to participating in co-development of collaborative and grantee accountability protocols, so this must be clarified.
Project adheres to OpenCivics Ethical Standards and Pledge.
Without explicit affirmation of adherence, it's uncertain whether the project complies with OpenCivics Ethical Standards and Pledge, and this would need to be confirmed by the project.
Project stewards pass OFAC screening process.
This criterion cannot be evaluated without direct knowledge of the result of an OFAC screening process for the project stewards.
Optional: Project is encouraged to include focus on collaboration between projects or on tools and infrastructures for collaboration.
The project seems to encourage collaborative research, sharing findings, and methodologies openly, and aims to connect various stakeholders, fulfilling the optional criterion.