Please support OpenLitterMap
Developed since 2008, this project maps global litter in real-time and aims to stimulate local zero waste economies using cryptocurrency. Urgent funding is needed to keep it online.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 3 Aug 2024 07:01 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project has been in development since 2008, which is well over 3 months old.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems’ CO2 Sequestration.
The project focuses mainly on mapping litter, which could be seen as an initiative related to climate activism and education, but the direct impact on GHG reduction or core web3 climate infrastructure is not explicitly stated.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) are required to provide a new update on their progress and impact via KarmaGAP. Each project must have a minimum of 2 milestones updated since the completion of GG20 AND include a summary of the project’s climate impact over the past year. Projects can also include the challenges they have faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and provide context for your work and accomplishments
The project provided a KarmaGAP link which suggests there are updates and progress reported.
Even if the project was accepted into previous rounds, grantees will be eliminated from participation in the GG21QF Round for the following reasons:
-If they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community
-If they submit more than one project into the round
-If they are primarily a token launch or NFT project to raise money for a liquidity pool
-If the project does not clearly demonstrate a primary focus on being a climate solution with clear and proven climate impacts
There is no indication that the project is involved in Sybil attacks, multiple project submissions, or being primarily a token/NFT launch for liquidity pool funding. The project's climate impact focus is reasonable, although it could be stated more clearly.
All returning grantees are required to include the following:
-An update to their proposal including any lessons learned from previous work
-A description of how they plan to use the additional funding from the upcoming round and how additional funding will help the project meet its goals
-A rough timeline for the project overall
-A short bio for each team member and their qualifications
The application provides some project updates and team information but lacks detailed lessons learned, a funding plan, and a rough timeline.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team’s expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The founder has extensive experience including two master's degrees, self-taught coding skills, and several years of practical work in startups, making the project credible and viable.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility.
No information suggests that the project does not comply with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility.