Scaling-Up Community-Driven Adaptive Capacity and Resilience of Peasants and Artisanal Fishing Community Living around the Threatened Biodiversity Hotspot of Mida Creek
Develop and implement climate-resilient livelihood programs to empower vulnerable communities in Kilifi County, Kenya, through sustainable practices, biodiversity conservation, and alternative income sources, enhancing their long-term well-being.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 2 Aug 2024 01:01 AM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project is 12 months old according to the provided information.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems’ CO2 Sequestration.
The project is focused on climate solutions, specifically through mangrove restoration (natural systems CO2 sequestration), sustainable fishing and aquaculture, and promoting energy-efficient technologies.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) are required to provide a new update on their progress and impact via KarmaGAP. Each project must have a minimum of 2 milestones updated since the completion of GG20 AND include a summary of the project’s climate impact over the past year. Projects can also include the challenges they have faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and provide context for your work and accomplishments
There is no explicit mention of a KarmaGAP update with milestones from previous GG20 round included in the provided information.
Even if the project was accepted into previous rounds, grantees will be eliminated from participation in the GG21QF Round for the following reasons:
-If they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community
-If they submit more than one project into the round
-If they are primarily a token launch or NFT project to raise money for a liquidity pool
-If the project does not clearly demonstrate a primary focus on being a climate solution with clear and proven climate impacts
There is no evidence suggesting the project is involved in Sybil attacks, submitting more than one project, primarily focusing on token/NFT launches, or lacking clear climate impacts.
All returning grantees are required to include the following:
-An update to their proposal including any lessons learned from previous work
-A description of how they plan to use the additional funding from the upcoming round and how additional funding will help the project meet its goals
-A rough timeline for the project overall
-A short bio for each team member and their qualifications
The application includes an update on past impacts, how additional funding will be used, a detailed project timeline, and bios for each team member.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team’s expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project's goals, activities, and team credentials appear credible and within the realm of viability for addressing climate solutions.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility.
There is no information to suggest non-compliance with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility.