User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:43 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The project description provided for 'test' does not contain any explicit details on how the work has supported or will support the Gitcoin community.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
The submission from 'test' lacks sufficient details to determine whether it represents an individual or a team. It is unclear due to the name 'test' and lack of explicit identification if the grant applicant is an individual.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
The submission for 'test' does not indicate whether the funding is for work done, planned work, or both, nor is there a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
Without detailed information and a thorough submission, it is impossible to determine if the 'test' project meets the full eligibility criteria as outlined in the provided document.