GrantsScope developed by Rohit Malekar

GrantsScope developed by Rohit Malekar

AI tool improves visibility and decision-making for web3 public goods funding donors by enabling queries about projects, assessing impact, and providing equitable exposure for all grantees.
Application
Applied on: 26 Sep 2023 11:34 AM
Approved
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:43 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The project 'GrantsScope - Grantee Discovery Using LLMs' outlines its contribution by improving discoverability of projects and reducing information asymmetry for donors within the Gitcoin ecosystem through the deployment of LLMs. The provided examples and usage statistics demonstrate actual support rendered to the Gitcoin Community in prior rounds.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
Based on the project description and associated GitHub user profile, it appears that 'GrantsScope - Grantee Discovery Using LLMs' is being submitted by an individual, Rohit Malekar, as opposed to a team, which complies with the criteria focused on individual submissions.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
The grant proposal clearly indicates work that has already been completed (retroactive) with links to live apps deployed in previous Gitcoin rounds, as well as outlines the proposed work for future rounds including quality improvements, distribution, and modality enhancements.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
Without access to the full document detailing all eligibility criteria, it is not possible to accurately determine compliance with all requirements. The score relies on public criteria and the provided project information, but a full assessment against the linked document cannot be made without reviewing its contents.