Tim's Gitcoin Feedback
Critiqued Gitcoin Grants process; invited to apply to citizen round for potential improvements.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:34 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The project description indicated that feedback was provided to Gitcoin on its grants process. However, there is no explicit outline of how this work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community within a grant proposal.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
The project is named 'Tim's Gitcoin Feedback,' which suggests an individual submission rather than a team project.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
Based on the information provided, it is not clear whether the funding is for work done, planned work, or a mixture of both. No clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work is provided.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
Cannot evaluate against the full eligibility criteria as the detailed list is contained within an external document that the AI cannot access, and therefore a complete evaluation against all eligibility criteria cannot be determined.