Regens Unite
A platform that connects sectors working on regenerative climate solutions through curated events, educational media, and partnerships, fostering collaboration and innovation in web3.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 5 Aug 2024 07:01 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. We use Twitter, web domain registration date, and other public info to determine this. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project was launched in May 2022, which is more than 3 months old.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions. Examples include: Renewable Energy, Oracles & DMRV, Supply Chain Analysis, Carbon Accounting, climate activists / collectives, Natural Systems’ CO2 Sequestration.
The project is focused on community building and educational events around regenerative solutions and climate education, connecting experts in the field which indirectly helps in addressing climate issues.
Grantees who received funding in a previous round(s) are required to provide a new update on their progress and impact via KarmaGAP. Each project must have a minimum of 2 milestones updated since the completion of GG20 AND include a summary of the project’s climate impact over the past year. Projects can also include the challenges they have faced. This will ensure accountability to supporters and provide context for your work and accomplishments
The project has provided a KarmaGAP link and mentioned updates about their events and programs. They have shared impacts such as attendee numbers and implemented regenerative practices at events.
Even if the project was accepted into previous rounds, grantees will be eliminated from participation in the GG21QF Round for the following reasons: -If they are found to be encouraging or enabling Sybil attacks or other forms of malicious manipulation of the grants platform or the Gitcoin community -If they submit more than one project into the round -If they are primarily a token launch or NFT project to raise money for a liquidity pool -If the project does not clearly demonstrate a primary focus on being a climate solution with clear and proven climate impacts
There is no indication provided that the project is involved in Sybil attacks, multiple project submissions, or primarily a token launch/NFT project for liquidity pool. The project appears to be genuinely focused on climate solutions.
All returning grantees are required to include the following: -An update to their proposal including any lessons learned from previous work -A description of how they plan to use the additional funding from the upcoming round and how additional funding will help the project meet its goals -A rough timeline for the project overall -A short bio for each team member and their qualifications
The application includes lessons learned from previous events, a description of how additional funding will be used, a rough timeline for upcoming events and initiatives, and team bios with their respective qualifications.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project is very early, it must still seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Including information about the team’s expertise, qualifications and skills will help us review your grant. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project seems credible with a clear focus and substantial progress so far, including the organization of multiple successful events. The team members have relevant expertise and qualifications detailed in their bios.
Projects must comply with Gitcoin core rules and eligibility.
The project has confirmed compliance with Gitcoin's core rules and eligibility.