SANE Foundation: Pioneering Web3 Climate Solutions in Bioregions Worldwide
Web3-powered S.A.N.E. Foundation fosters global climate solutions through bioregional stewardship, regenerative economies, and a novel SANEconomy system that values natural capital and community well-being.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 14 Feb 2024 05:48 PM
Projects must be at least 3 months old. Newer projects should establish themselves and submit to the next round.
The project age is not specified in the provided description, so it is unclear whether the project meets the age requirement.
The Grant must be primarily focused on climate solutions (the group may do other work but the grant proposal should be directly related to climate solutions). The proposal should explicitly outline how this project will help reduce GHGs or is an important core infrastructure for web3 climate solutions.
The project is clearly focused on climate solutions through bioregional stewardship and ecosystem restoration, and the proposal includes details on how the project uses web3 technology to support these efforts.
Grantees who received funding in previous rounds should report on project progress since GR15 or the Alpha & Beta rounds. We understand that some projects may have less progress given the timing of Alpha & Beta round disbursements. This will ensure accountability to supporters and also help encourage contributors by showing what you’ve been accomplishing.
There is no information provided about previous funding rounds or reports on project progress since then, making it impossible to assess compliance with this criterion.
All returning grantees are expected to update their proposal, in addition to project updates the proposal should include lessons learned from previous work and how they will use the additional funding from the upcoming round. The updated proposal should indicate how additional funding will help the project meet its goals, and include a rough timeline for the project overall.
The proposal does not mention updates from previously funded rounds or lessons learned, nor does it detail how the additional funding will be used along with a timeline, which is necessary for evaluation.
There is a general expectation that projects are within the “realm of viability”. Even if a project may be at a very early stage, it still must seem credible to the average person with an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. Grantee founders must genuinely intend to build the project, and the project must not broadly be considered an impossibility.
The project description shows a clear intention to build and advance the project, and it appears to be credible given an understanding of web3 technology and climate solutions. The project does not appear to broadly be considered an impossibility.