Impact Reporting Interoperability
Aligning impact reporting tools and frameworks among civic actors and cosmo-local networks to enhance coherence, collaboration, and economic support through facilitated discussions, publications, and incentivizing non-Web3 impact reporting.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 6 Aug 2024 02:01 AM
At least one project lead must be a member of the OpenCivics Consortium
The application does not explicitly state whether a project lead is a member of the OpenCivics Consortium.
Projects must conduct research that is Creative Commons as a public good
The project aims to align impact reporting tools and frameworks, which implies that the research will be open and benefit the public good.
Research must fall into one of the focus areas listed in the round description
The project's focus on impact reporting interoperability aligns with the goals of fostering collaboration among civic innovators and community organizers.
Projects must agree to coordinate and collaborate during and after the round with other grantees to collate and present their research progress in a Grantee Impact Showcase prior to GG22
The project's plan includes collaborative discussions and the presentation of findings, which aligns with this requirement.
Grant applications must direct funds to a multi-signature wallet
The application does not specify whether the funds will be directed to a multi-signature wallet.
Projects must indicate what collaborative mechanism they will utilize to govern, evaluate and compensate participant contributions (Coordinape, DeWork, Charmverse, Notion, DAO Haus, Google Docs & Sheets, etc)
The project mentions using Google Docs & Sheets as the collaborative governance mechanism.
Projects must indicate reasonable and verifiable milestones for the following possible funding amounts received: $1,000; $3,000; $6,000
The application outlines specific milestones for each funding level: discussions and alignment for $1k, publishing an article for $3k, and incentivizing non Web3 natives for $6k.