Mirror
DAO platform for residential governance, successful in a 9-person house, integrates Slack-bot for community management, and aims to evolve to Web3. Funding sought for development and expansion.Application
Applied on: 29 Jul 2024 05:45 PM
Approved
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 29 Jul 2024 06:01 PM
CollabTech project - organisations on-chain, evolution of B2B SaaS, network states tooling & DAO tooling, and future of work; projects advancing reputation, governance & decision making, operations (accounting, sales automation, inventory management, talent, etc), community, and contributor tooling!
Chore Wheel aligns with CollabTech by enabling community governance, decision making, and operations management within coliving communities. It is a DAO tool advancing community and contributor tooling.
Commercial viability or perennial Public Goods: projects addressing a clear need for a specific target user and with the ability to continue to deliver value over time (financial sustainability through business model and/or immutability)
Chore Wheel addresses a clear need for coliving communities to manage shared responsibilities and governance. The project is open-source with a managed service business model for long-term sustainability.
Maximum project development duration of 12 weeks (i.e. value delivered within 12 weeks)
The project indicates that significant improvements in marketing capabilities are expected within 4-6 months, which exceeds the 12-week development duration requirement.
Threshold: Projects must declare a “threshold” (minimum amount of funds needed to complete the project/feature/prototype and deliver value). Thoroughness in defining their threshold and feasibility (threshold within the range of match-funding available) will be key for approval into the round. Projects not able to attain the threshold (with combined donations + match funding), will not receive match funding but can still keep donations.
The project description does not specify a threshold amount or detailed budget requirements, making it unclear if the threshold and feasibility criteria are thoroughly defined.
General Criteria: Incomplete, poorly structured, unfeasible, or otherwise poorly conceived applications will be rejected.
The application is well-structured and provides detailed information about the project's purpose, team, and current status, indicating it is neither incomplete nor poorly conceived.