Religio DAO
Religio DAOUser Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 16 Apr 2024 10:11 PM
Project is creating impact through public goods, civic service, civic works, civic innovations or civic utilities.
The project does not clearly demonstrate impact through public goods, civic service, civic works, civic innovations, or civic utilities specific to this round's focus on civic engagement and stewardship.
Project exhibits clear relevance to the broad framing of civic innovation.
The project's connection to 'civic innovation' is ambiguous and does not clearly align with the usual technological or systemic approaches to civic issues.
At least one project steward is a member of OpenCivics consortium.
There is no information provided to ascertain whether any project steward is a member of the OpenCivics consortium.
Project team size and skills correlates to use of funds and desired impact.
Insufficient information about the team's size and skills relating to the fund usage and desired impact is provided.
Project demonstrates a clear track record of previous work.
The project is described as a long-life project with only a few months of existence and does not show a clear track record of previous work.
Project must agree to participate in co-development of collaborative and grantee accountability protocols as part of their impact reporting process.
There is no explicit agreement or refusal mentioned for participation in co-development of collaborative and grantee accountability protocols.
Project adheres to OpenCivics Ethical Standards and Pledge.
The provided information does not indicate whether the project explicitly adheres to the OpenCivics Ethical Standards and Pledge.
Project stewards pass OFAC screening process.
There is no provided evidence or information concerning the outcome of an OFAC screening process for the project stewards.
Optional: Project is encouraged to include focus on collaboration between projects or on tools and infrastructures for collaboration.
The project mentions developing socio-technological processes for coordination, which indicates a focus on collaboration infrastructure.