KarlaGod (Raising Developers to build on PGN)

KarlaGod (Raising Developers to build on PGN)

Training African student developers to build public goods on PGN network, including educational meet-ups, hackathons, and a web3 education dApp featuring and promoting the Gitcoin Passport system.
Application
Applied on: 8 Oct 2023 01:26 AM
Approved
User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:15 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The KarlaGod project outlines several specific initiatives aimed at raising developers in Africa to build public goods products on the PGN network, which supports the Gitcoin Community's mission of building and funding public goods. The project also discusses integrating Gitcoin Passport and educating about Gitcoin Rounds, which directly contributes to the Gitcoin ecosystem.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
The proposal comes from 'KarlaGod,' which appears to be an individual's username. However, the project involves a network of university student developers and does not clarify if the submission is by a single individual representing them or if the project itself is considered the applicant.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
The grant proposal lacks clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work. Although it mentions ongoing activities and future plans, it does not specify what has already been completed and what is yet to be started, nor does it provide a breakdown of funding allocation for each.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
Without access to the mentioned document, the full extent of eligibility cannot be assessed against the project details provided. Therefore, a definitive score cannot be given based on the available information.