Flowscience
Long-time Gitcoin community member seeks support for basic living while contributing to public goods and open-source software; aspires to be more active in governance and community engagement.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:59 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The grant proposal details numerous contributions to the Gitcoin ecosystem, including advocacy, supporting other projects during grant rounds, participating in Gitcoin governance forums, and future goals directly related to enhancing the Gitcoin community.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
The proposal is clearly submitted by an individual, Elijah (flowscience), and does not indicate a team submission.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
The grantee indicates that any support received will fund basic living essentials for ongoing work, suggesting a mixed focus but does not explicitly demarcate between retroactive and proposed work, although there is a significant historical account of their past contributions.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
The provided document link is inaccessible for review, hence a full evaluation against all criteria in the document cannot be completed. The score is given based on the available information.