Public Ads - Quadratic Attention Payments Mechanism
Developing a user-influenced advertising system that uses quadratic voting to improve ad quality and relevance, enhance data privacy, and increase rewards for users, advertisers, and publishers.User Review
AI Review
A1
Reviewed on 15 Feb 2024 08:56 AM
The Grant proposal should explicitly outline how your work supported or will support the Gitcoin Community.
The project description suggests that the Quadratic Attention Payments mechanism could align with Gitcoin's mission of building and funding digital public goods. However, without explicit details on how it supports or will support the Gitcoin community, it is not possible to conclusively score this criterion.
This round focuses first and foremost on individuals not projects. Multiple individuals are not allowed to submit as one team submission.
The user GitHub provided indicates individual activity, and there is no indication that the submission is from multiple individuals. Therefore, it appears to meet the criterion of an individual submission.
Indicate clearly whether the grantee is focusing on funding for work done (retroactive), planned work (proposed) or both (mixed). If it’s both, the grant should have a clear demarcation between retroactive and proposed work
Without explicit information from the project's Gitcoin Forum post or description concerning the funding focus, it is unclear whether the grantee is seeking retroactive, proposed, or mixed funding. Thus, this criterion cannot be evaluated without further details.
For full eligibility criteria, visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CMptTOyljfYgGtcebpF8RcXz01Yhuo0Ebv5cUWgudUQ/edit?usp=sharing
Without direct access to the content of the project's proposal and only generic project information being available, it is not possible to cross-reference every point in the full eligibility criteria document. A full evaluation would require a thorough review of the grant proposal against the detailed requirements listed in the document.